Back to shop ↗
THE HOLDEN COMMODORE FORUM

HOLDCOM Community

Built around the cars. Kept alive by the people.

+ Start a discussion
Holden Commodores gathered at Holdcom
Forum Home›VL Commodore
VL Commodore

VL Fuel Economy

Started by TRb30ett · 28 June 2006 · 24 replies

Preserved from CalaisTurbo (partial recovery). Original authors and dates are shown; archived members are not current Holdcom accounts.

TRb30ettArchived member
Factory fuel consumption ratings for this engine in VL Commodore's are, Manual = 1295kg's Kerb Weight, Fuel type 91 RON ULP Fuel tank capacity (litres) 63 City 10.5 Highway 7.4 Auto = 1325kg's Kerb Weight, Fuel type 91 RON ULP Fuel tank capacity (litres) 63 City 11.5 Highway 7.4 I have a 5spd manual, car weigh's 1172kg's, 2.5" exhaust no cat and a cold air intake, and i get on average about 1L worse than factory fuel consumption, however i have got slightly better than factory with sadate driving,
0 likes
Wilko16Archived member
having no catylic cnoverter will make your fuel economy worse
0 likes
vl powerArchived member
Quote: Originally Posted by TRb30ett Factory fuel consumption ratings for this engine in VL Commodore's are, Manual = 1295kg's Kerb Weight, Fuel type 91 RON ULP Fuel tank capacity (litres) 63 City 10.5 Highway 7.4 Auto = 1325kg's Kerb Weight, Fuel type 91 RON ULP Fuel tank capacity (litres) 63 City 11.5 Highway 7.4 I have a 5spd manual, car weigh's 1172kg's, 2.5" exhaust no cat and a cold air intake, and i get on average about 1L worse than factory fuel consumption, however i have got slightly better than factory with sadate driving, how accurate are these figures, as others would say that they should be higher at approx 11ltr/100 hyw , whereas my VL's figures work out at approx 9.6ltr/100 hyw using 3.08 diff gearing which is fine on the open road not that thrilling in city driving, where as my second VL geared at 3.45 has figures of approx 11.7ltr/100 hyw but does better in city driving than my first VL. Going by the above quoted figures 7.4ltr/100 that would work out approx 850 k's to 63ltr tank, I could only dream of figures like that. As i do huge km's travelling interstate all year I choose the VL that gives the better comsumption, long hyw runs for one , and use the other when doing more city driving.
0 likes
TRb30ettArchived member
"having no catylic cnoverter will make your fuel economy worse" I had the choice of either 2 mufflers or 1 muffler and a cat - i choose the 2 mufflers as my car was deafening when standing outside, and pretty awful inside - the noise felt like it was getting into your head - so i ditched the Cat and installed a 2nd muffler, vl power, Well for me, i have 3,9:1 diff gears and my fuel consumption is close to what the "factory" fuel consumption figures say i should be getting for city driving, sometimes worse, sometimes better, i havent really driven my car much on the highway though,
0 likes
VL_RB25DEArchived member
removing the cat means removing emmissions devises, and is a big fine, just get a high flow, than its legile and it will flow
0 likes
Sign in or create an account to reply. New members are welcome—no purchase or old CT account needed.

Who’s online

0 members and 1 guest active in the last 15 minutes

No signed-in members active right now. Guests are welcome to browse.

Visitors Today1

33,602 threads, 484,230 posts and 24,897 images saved from CalaisTurbo.
As at . Recovery is continuing.