It's an rb30det..... 30 block, dual cams... there's no such thing as a 26/30det lol thats like saying, Fuck your a poofter gaybo, or a gay queer, or a faggot homo to someone.

still calling it a rb30

has anyone bought one of R.I.P.S plenums wat are they like compared to say a JD or RAJAB?

Quote: Originally Posted by ATMO_BT1 no faith This man knows.

you also make more revs with smaller cubic inches you can make more power that way

Wow that R.I.P.S fella has it all susd out Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

all sused out ?? how so its always the new kids on the block that get the attention hks are the record holders rips doesnt understand what a hybrid is

He has light car with 26/30 all sorted out.. lets see over the next few months what happens Its a quick car no doubt just a pitty its not a vl. dont think 240s came with rbs Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

yeah but a chassis car over a vl body is hardly a vl either rob lol we could super tec but yeah end of the day its tuff as seeing rb's go fast Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Quote: Originally Posted by ANK there is already a vl running a gt55 or a gt50 and thats what the 2j boys run the car above is only a 2.8 also Really? BOOSTN? Quote: Originally Posted by ANK not enough to compete with the 2js You can't really compare the two engines anyway, like comparing apples with oranges. But with time we will see the mighty RB30 pushing out some serious power, maybe not as great as the 2JZ but then again some of the worlds best racing companies have been having years of experience with the 2JZ and have been pushing them for years. You can't even compare the RB26 to a 2JZ. Now it will get interesting when people begin to use the RD28 block Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Quote: Originally Posted by 5spdvl RIPS motor is clearly a RB33DETT. All components (block and head) are Nissan RB spec. Numbers signify capacity in the RB range, always has. 3.3L equals 33. D has always meant DOHC. E has always meant EFI (I think?). T has always meant turbo. TT has always meant twin turbo. RB33DETT. Agreed, but that motor is for a customer, the motor in their drag car is an RB30DET

ohh30t is on the money BUT single and twin cam is different but calling a 26 headed 30 block still a rb30 is FKING STUUUUUUUPID

Quote: Originally Posted by ANK ohh30t is on the money BUT single and twin cam is different but calling a 26 headed 30 block still a rb30 is FKING STUUUUUUUPID Calling a 3L RB a 26/30 is farken stupid too

Now Ank is on the money. Quote: Originally Posted by NZ EVLHSV Agreed, but that motor is for a customer, the motor in their drag car is an RB30DET Yeah yeah, I'm not talking about their 240Z. Just the one pictured above. Only problem with that nomenclature system is it doesn't specify which head you're running, but that's just details. Just like it doesn't specify what turbo/s you're running.

This is a ridiculously stupid argument. Wether it's an RB30 with a single cam or twin cam head, it's the bottom end that determines the displacement. AN RB30ET was released as just that, but think about this. The Sammut Racing Brothers 300ZX had Mechanical Injection, not Electrical Injection. Does that mean that all along it infact wasn't the fastest RB30 for all those years, because it didn't retain the original 'E' that RB30's were released with, and to also mention that it was twin turbo'd, so it doesn't fall under the 'T' category either. I don't think so, and that's no different to wether an RB30 boasts a single cam or twin cam head. Jason.

Quote: Originally Posted by 5spdvl Yeah yeah, I'm not talking about their 240Z. Just the one pictured above. Only problem with that nomenclature system is it doesn't specify which head you're running, but that's just details. Just like it doesn't specify what turbo/s you're running. Nor what pistons, gearbox, diff etc. At the end of the day it's a Nissan 3L RB series motor (RB30) with a heap of changes to the factory produced motor

If they come factory with Twin cams, it would still be called an RB30. End.

Rb30mtt

Quote: Originally Posted by 5spdvl Rb30mtt Exactly and it's still an RB30. Jason.

Yeah man, I agree with you. I'm just saying there could be a basic nomenclature system to give a rough idea of what it is. Like RB30MTT. Had it been twin cam and 3L, and twin turbo'd, RB30DMTT.