the fully sick street ricers think 12/13 is the world.

12 in a na is fairly good

a 12 in an n/a would be an amazing achievement considering. But a 12 is still a 12 and a 12 is not "fast".

Quote: Originally Posted by jigsy fella's it doesnt take a big amount of money to make an n/a fast, i know fisrt hand that rover built his car for under $2500 including tuning and diff. Nice avator, dunno how long it will last! 2500 for a turbo conversion i'd rather!

Well my car - VL n/a is pushing out around 125rwkw and its fast but not that fast compared to other cars like R32's and R33's. Anyway the place who fitted my aftermarket cam in Brissie called HeadTorque had a 5 speed VL (owned by their apprentice) that was running high 13's at Willowbank. It was stroked to 3.3L. Cheers, JR.

sounds like that rover guy is good at racing Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Quote: Originally Posted by joel It was stroked to 3.3L. and what is this stroker you speak of??? i thought there was no kit for the rb30 made or is this a crank off another rb motor that fits?

I thought that 3.1 was the limit?

not if you used a larger crank i would imagine, but im just guessing?

Quote: Originally Posted by NA-jet and what is this stroker you speak of??? i thought there was no kit for the rb30 made or is this a crank off another rb motor that fits? The R30 series skyline that had the L24 6 cylinder motor in it. Also used the valves from this motor.

Quote: Originally Posted by hsvtrev There is 11 sec 202's out there that are N/A, so its most definitely possible with a RB30. But as said above, the improvement that a turbo gives with little expense is without a doubt the best way to go. And I'm tipping you N/A supporters haven't been in a decent VLT, because I have changed the minds of people who own 400 chev's after going for a spin. Yep I mean if a old carbie 6 can do it why cant a EFI 6 do the same thing? and im sure to mod a 202 to do those sort of times would cost more than to do it to a RB30. Hell even the old Buick V6 can do it in N/A. I think alot of people under estimate the N/A RB30s too much.I know the RB30ET is a great engine but its not like the RB30E is a different engine altogether.

Quote: Originally Posted by SIKGMH Who has the quickest N/A VL on this Forum? N/A WOULD HAVE TO INCLUDE V8'S Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

202's are a fantastic engine and were under-rated by everyone for a long time

hsvtrev was that a carby or an injected 202? Noidz what sort of specs do these quick 202's have?

Quote: Originally Posted by joel The R30 series skyline that had the L24 6 cylinder motor in it. Also used the valves from this motor. what year skyline was that from????

mi mate had a vl drove it as hard as it would go got a cracked head on it it did 13.6 seconds with just a tune4 and pod it flies well it did till it ****ed up

If i changed my cam from mild to wild i would crack the 13sec bracket. Ran it a few years ago when i just dropped the engine in behind a 5 speed and i did a 15.1with 110rwkw's on a 42degree day at calder with 17's.

why dont you?

Quote: Originally Posted by SYRUS If i changed my cam from mild to wild i would crack the 13sec bracket. I highly doubt that A camshaft would not give you the power to go from a lower 15sec. to a high 13sec. pass Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

my dads old 72 LJ Torana had a 202 in it , and that thing use to run 13's N/A with a little work done to it...