Preserved from CalaisTurbo. Original authors and dates are shown; archived members are not current Holdcom accounts.
09-12-04, 15:25 GMT+10#61 i can bet turbo vl in my n/a auto down the 1/4 i think they where stuffed but my best time is a 15.3
0 likes
09-12-04, 15:26 GMT+10#62 Quote:
Originally Posted by [.nugget.]
whats the mods?
Was that for me?
Anyways it just has a K & N Pod filter and a sports exhaust nothing special.
0 likes
09-12-04, 17:16 GMT+10#63 Quote:
Originally Posted by smgreen87
dont be a smart ass faggot
I'll stop dribbling shiit if you do too
0 likes
09-12-04, 17:23 GMT+10#64 I'm starting to think this threads been done before, either way whatevers needed to be said has been.. And if anything its only going to get the youngens out racing everything and anything.
Lock please?
0 likes
09-12-04, 18:00 GMT+10#65 i have a na and i reckon i might have a chance against a VW beetle.
Attention: "Street racing is not cool"
0 likes
09-12-04, 18:05 GMT+10#66 Quote:
Originally Posted by 5speed
Was that for me?
Anyways it just has a K & N Pod filter and a sports exhaust nothing special.
yeh it was for you man but i find it pretty hard to beleive u beat vt v6s
0 likes
09-12-04, 18:32 GMT+10#67 What's better than winning a drag in a N/A VL?
Not driving an N/A VL
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
09-12-04, 21:58 GMT+10#68 Quote:
Originally Posted by OldGold
What's better than winning a drag in a N/A VL?
Not driving an N/A VL
Why do you come into a NA VL commodore thread and pay them out over and over again? Your funny, that was hilarious, Plz fark off.
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
09-12-04, 22:23 GMT+10#69 My first VL was a N/A and one night going home on highway i came accross this black non turbo supra new shape i beat him from 100kms on wards thats with my auto back in 2nd gear,Only mod my car had was straight though exhaust...O and my timing was advanced LOL
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
10-12-04, 00:19 GMT+10#70 Quote:
Originally Posted by on19sVL
Why do you come into a NA VL commodore thread and pay them out over and over again? Your funny, that was hilarious, Plz fark off.
I've got a non turbo car and I pay non turbo cars out? They are ****.. End of story.
0 likes
10-12-04, 15:23 GMT+10#71 Quote:
Originally Posted by [.nugget.]
yeh it was for you man but i find it pretty hard to beleive u beat vt v6s
Only the stock autos with old ladies driving them lol
But seriously I think my VL is capable of beating a VT in a drag only if I change the gears perfectly.
0 likes
10-12-04, 22:35 GMT+10#72 Quote:
Originally Posted by bextor84
I've got a non turbo car and I pay non turbo cars out? They are ****.. End of story.
Where did i say NA VLs arent S H I T ? Yes they are slow, but i will still drive a NA VL over any four or "ricer" out there.
Also, we know you think they are " S H I T " from previous posts, but you dont have to keep saying it.
Why do the VLTurbo crowd keep thinking they are top S H I T by putting down NA VLs, in there own thread. Yes i know you are not a turbo member and yes NA's are slower. We know this!
0 likes
10-12-04, 23:41 GMT+10#73 Quote:
Originally Posted by 5speed
Only the stock autos with old ladies driving them lol
But seriously I think my VL is capable of beating a VT in a drag only if I change the gears perfectly.
Yes your VL would be capable of beating a VT, I was horrified at the lack of power past 3500rpm when I drove one. It's like driving a tractor, there's miles of torque down low but nothing up top.
0 likes
11-12-04, 03:43 GMT+10#74 Quote:
Originally Posted by on19sVL
Where did i say NA VLs arent S H I T ? Yes they are slow, but i will still drive a NA VL over any four or "ricer" out there.
Also, we know you think they are " S H I T " from previous posts, but you dont have to keep saying it.
Why do the VLTurbo crowd keep thinking they are top S H I T by putting down NA VLs, in there own thread. Yes i know you are not a turbo member and yes NA's are slower. We know this!
Because we come in and see lies with people exaggerating their kill stories.
And why wouldn't you want a 4 or a ricer..
You do realise theres Japanese 4 cylinder cars that'd kick a vl's ass any day of the week.
0 likes
11-12-04, 11:39 GMT+10#75 i raced a mates EB falcon in my old 1992 1.5L inj. Excel and i beat him, but second run he flogged me cause he used the lower gears in the auto 'box, the excel was a manual. I also raced my mates carbi VK auto (thrashed and on its last legs) and he beat me by half a car length, i was in a 5spd NA VL and im placing the blame on the fact it is difficult to get traction out of my car. It really depends on all sorts of things, this is really a pointless thread. A civis with an insane amount of NOS and a ridiculouly large turbo could beat a NA VL and in the same manner a NA VL with crazy mods, minitubs etc could beat a stock VZ commodore.
0 likes
11-12-04, 12:10 GMT+10#76 i got beaten in my n/a vl by my mate who was on foot.
seriously though. why bother racing in a n/a vl? keep your points and money and buy a half fast car if you really want to
0 likes
11-12-04, 12:39 GMT+10#77 i race my n/a vl for fun not for seriousness, ive beat a few cars, pulsars, n/a auto vls and n/a manual vls, auto vs's, ive come close to some vns but they always seem to get me after about 60km but i also prefer to drift my vl in the wet, im happy with my vl atm for my first car cos if i was in a turbo vl i would be dead by now..
0 likes
11-12-04, 13:08 GMT+10#78 You prefer to spin your rear wheels in the wet.. No drifting..
By the way guys I hope all these races are on the track.
0 likes
11-12-04, 14:57 GMT+10#79 of course
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
11-12-04, 15:19 GMT+10#80 Quote:
Originally Posted by bextor84
By the way guys I hope all these races are on the track.
Did you think we would do street drags na never.
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes