Quote: Originally Posted by gyix well lancer beat you sorry to here that but you know you look better then a lancer even if you are stock so stop trying to beat him and just kill him in looks Amen. A N/A might not be good for performance, but you can still make one look hot and they are one of the nicest looking cars, from the mid 80s. (VLs in general are) Point is, I would rather look good, then to go fast and just about any VL craps on a Lancer (Well maybe not EVOs) in looks anyway. Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Kane as a baby Now this is something that LOOKS good!

mmmm. sexy.. red.. oh yes..

yer our little N/A jap cars arnt to bad. i have a 2 litre celica, just advanced timing and exhaust, if i drive it to its limits I reckon I could keep up with an auto N/A vl probably even beat it. car weighs close to a tonne. but like everyone says at the end of the day most N/A's are just as gutless as each other, hehehe thats why i have a GT4 conversion lined up for mine Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Your Celica should smoke an N/A VL mate if you have any idea how to drive. Most early to mid 90s twin cam jap cars will destroy an N/A RB30.

Quote: Originally Posted by 1sikvlc r33 i no its hard to beleve but iv wasted a lot of cars wana go for a run hahaha Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

^^^^^^^^^^ where are we running to i could be in for that PM me the details. SHOCKING NEWS FLASH today i got beaten by lancer i cant belive it. even thow it was in my GF's carolla it dont mean **** i now have respect for them

as in a drag race.... DERRR Id be shattered if a vl n/a auto beat me id sell up and buy a vl Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ a race with cars dang, i had my runners on and was waiting for you to PM me.

front runners or nikies Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Quote: Originally Posted by Raptor Yeah im sure. lol. lol , im not fuesed at all if no one belives me, it was a r32 that i raced not a 33. i know it did so im happy it was just after i did the engine swap, btw bogz my car has a cracked head now (happend that week before we raced lol) no wonder its a slow pos atm lol... think its time for a rebuild or new head, Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

my n/a i got 150hp at wheels from cam,exhurst,extractors, and it did piss for a n/a think should have beatin lancers wit that combo

Auto's steal too much power, N/A's don't have very much to give anyway. Manuals bite much harder and put more of the power down than an auto.

Quote: Originally Posted by 1sikvlc Next Time Put Her In To 2nd And Work Ur Way To Drive Ive Done That And I Bet A Skyline Turbo Lol His Ask If I Had Turbo I Ask Him He Said Yes I Told Him To Piss It Off U Got Pumped By A 6 i call shenanigans

Quote: Originally Posted by jsl_vl if i got a shift kitted auto with a stally could i beat this lancer and how much would this cost Man just turbo ur N/A and ull beat him, u should have beat him in the first place i suppose!!!!! Dont worry about no shift kit... Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

maybe you should have got out and pushed

Quote: Originally Posted by 1sikvlc Next Time Put Her In To 2nd And Work Ur Way To Drive Ive Done That And I Bet A Skyline Turbo Lol His Ask If I Had Turbo I Ask Him He Said Yes I Told Him To Piss It Off U Got Pumped By A 6

Quote: Originally Posted by GLD-086 Amen. A N/A might not be good for performance, but you can still make one look hot and they are one of the nicest looking cars, from the mid 80s. (VLs in general are) Point is, I would rather look good, then to go fast and just about any VL craps on a Lancer (Well maybe not EVOs) in looks anyway. Man, I think you should marry a NA VL. all you is **** on about how good they are... Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Thats probably because he hasnt driven a vlt yet Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

i'll sum this thread up LANCERS THE ANSWER