THE HOLDEN COMMODORE FORUM

HOLDCOM Community

Built around the cars. Kept alive by the people.

VL Commodore

turbo auto Vs turbo manual.

Started by onetidyvl · 23 Aug 2011 · 3 replies

Preserved from CalaisTurbo. Original authors and dates are shown; archived members are not current Holdcom accounts. View original archive ↗

onetidyvlArchived member

23-08-11, 21:00 GMT+10#1

so me and a mate are having a debate about this. what are the pro's and cons about both boxes? or is there another thred on this?

0 likes

[T]MattyArchived member

23-08-11, 21:24 GMT+10#2

Turbo manual box will take more power then a Turbo auto. Then its really just personal choice.

0 likes

BYBYE NSWArchived member

24-08-11, 22:26 GMT+10#3

autos are quicker on the strip.manuals make more power.good built auto is expensive.manual is more fun people say but my favourite box was full manual auto.beats manual anyday

0 likes

raspaArchived member

02-09-11, 01:25 GMT+10#4

iv got a manulised auto dont get me wrong its awsome but i would have chosen manule if i could but it gos hard i ges manule is good if u like clutch kicking and geting it sidways but yeah the auto is a fun bit gear i like to get it sideway but it scares me when i get on boost i feel like i havent got eney control

0 likes

Sign in or create an account to reply. New members are welcome—no purchase or old CT account needed.

turbo auto Vs turbo manual.

Who’s online