Hey everyone... which would like rather have parked on your driveway? A VL TURBO, or VT TURBO. Here are some pics of a VT TURBO; By the way... say you wanted a VL to do 10's... how much would it cost? and why will you need to spend more on a VT to get it into the 10's? Are VL's made for lightening fast speeds. Thanks. Any comments appreciated Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

That front mount on the VT looks pox!

VL's are much lighter, and dam that engine bay is disgusting!!

Quote: Originally Posted by sherman89 VL's are much lighter, and dam that engine bay is disgusting!! too right, thats feral

Lets make the main focal point a frikin alternator..

VL is much better for times as its 300kgs+ lighter and has a live axle diff.. but that VT ran 11.2 @121mph and makes 330rwkw on 20psi. internally stock engine except for rocker arms. With the bar on you dont even see the cooler except though the main air hole.

i think 90% are going to say they would prefer a vl as its a vl sight lol... nice power though out of the vt

I'd love to see that with the bumper on. I like it Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

yeh go the vt turbo looks diffrent a newer nicer car even though i own vl trboo

what motor was the turbo put on in the VT, was it supercharged to start? sorry just doesnt look like an ecotec

well if those pics are from the FIT website, which it looks like they are, then that black vt is a mates car. it was an R&D project built by FIT to test the power limit of the super6 bottom end. car now makes 444 rwhp @ about 19psi i think, and the engine loves it. very quick car.

Quote: Originally Posted by vl_burgs what motor was the turbo put on in the VT, was it supercharged to start? sorry just doesnt look like an ecotec sort of.. its the supercharged motor, the same motor found on the factory supercharged v6s.. as it was once supercharged. dead stock except like said for the higher ratio rocker arms. only difference internally afaik is the pistons, they're not forged but bit tougher and ceramic coated i believe, and the rods are a bit thicker.. the heads also have injector holes in different spots due to the supercharger manifold. u can do it to your normal ecotec tho, just just pistons and rods aftermarket and itll be even stronger.

looks tough as mate. dunno if its cheaper to get a vt into the 10's rather than a vl but i could be wrong. how much was it to get that 11.2?

Nice car and it's also different too Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Quote: Originally Posted by Stooge looks tough as mate. dunno if its cheaper to get a vt into the 10's rather than a vl but i could be wrong. how much was it to get that 11.2? not mine.. lol and its not the posters either, thats a FIT development car www.v6supercharged.com (http://www.v6supercharged.com) i think is the site its just the price to bolt on the turbo pretty much, its the stock tranny and diff too! the turbo is just a gt35r so with the exhaust manifolds the turbo piping and a cooler tune fuel e.t.c it adds up but no worse than a vl

VT for sure, those 3.8s are mental with a decent sized single turbo, such torquey motors and so responsive. And that bay looks 10 times better than 90% of vl's on this site, the alternator might be ugly but at least it's ****ing neat lol.

Quote: Originally Posted by Sinister not mine.. lol and its not the posters either, thats a FIT development car www.v6supercharged.com (http://www.v6supercharged.com) i think is the site its just the price to bolt on the turbo pretty much, its the stock tranny and diff too! the turbo is just a gt35r so with the exhaust manifolds the turbo piping and a cooler tune fuel e.t.c it adds up but no worse than a vl oh so its a development car np. didnt think it was yours mate lol but thanx for clearing that up. it looks sick but im still with the vl turbo Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

Quote: Originally Posted by ATMO_BT1 VT for sure, those 3.8s are mental with a decent sized single turbo, such torquey motors and so responsive. And that bay looks 10 times better than 90% of vl's on this site, the alternator might be ugly but at least it's ****ing neat lol. for sure.. check the videos on their site, they do some 0-100 runs, quicker than a lamborghini

VTs are boats with IRS. Buy a 3.8L VS exec with live axle and whack a turbo on that!

that front mount looks really **** on the vt would go for a vlt for sure