Preserved from CalaisTurbo. Original authors and dates are shown; archived members are not current Holdcom accounts.
Gudday,
Ive got a RB20 in my VL and lately have been thinking of going to a rb25. Can anyone tell me the actual differences in the engines? like is it just the head/injectors changed? or is the bore/stroke different?
Also can anyone tell me if bov's are illegal in NSW?
Cheers!!!!
0 likes
lol well ones 2 litre and ones 2.5
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
WOW.. that was soo helpful DriftArab
Ill think youll find that the bore and stroke is different!
haha osrry i didnt help much either!
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
wouldnt be just a head swap,
compression
9:1 in Rb25det
8.5 in Rb20det
bore and stroke
86 X 71.7 in Rb25det
78 X 69.7 in Rb20det
of course more power with the Rb25det.
0 likes
www.rbforums.com (http://www.rbforums.com)
These guys have got info on EVERY RB series motor produced by Nissan.
0 likes
have you thought about stroking the rb20 to a rb22 or rb24?
figures on paper make a rb24 look better than a rb25 or 26... but it all depends on how much money u want to spend
0 likes
haha, sorry. a stroked RB20 "looks better" than a 26? how do you figure that one out?
0 likes
Wouldn't a stroked rb20 cost more than the rb25? You have to source the crank from a rb25 then you have to fit it.
0 likes
the figures on paper looked better..
i think it somehow worked out with a little more torque...
0 likes
13-12-04, 18:40 GMT+10#10 Stroker kits for RB20's are worth more than an RB25 is itself. With the money saved you could probably throw in some cams and a hi-flowed turbo. That'd look better on paper than a stroked RB20, believe me.
0 likes
13-12-04, 18:58 GMT+10#11 the stroker kits will spool the turbo faster as the exhaust displacement is greater...
then why would people stroke a rb26 to rb28 than buy a rb30 and make it a rb31?
0 likes
13-12-04, 21:36 GMT+10#12 I'm guessing because a rb28 would still like to rev hard, (not quite as hard as a 26).
Power = Torque * RPM
A stroker kit for a RB26 doesn't come cheap, and are designed to handle lots of power (i.e. it's the whole kit and caboodle (pistons, rods, crank etc etc)). A RB30 bottom end is dead set primitive in comparison.
0 likes
16-12-04, 16:37 GMT+10#13 [
PHP Code:
QUOTE=sp00nfed]I'm guessing because a rb28 would still like to rev hard, (not quite as hard as a 26).
Power = Torque * RPM
A stroker kit for a RB26 doesn't come cheap, and are designed to handle lots of power (i.e. it's the whole kit and caboodle (pistons, rods, crank etc etc)). A RB30 bottom end is dead set primitive in comparison.[/QUOTE]
I think it might rev harder harder.
0 likes
16-12-04, 17:08 GMT+10#14 Quote:
Originally Posted by calais25t
WTF as if it wont rev harder use ur ****en brain.
By changing the bore/stroke of an engine you change it's character, a RB28 would have more torque but would be unable to rev as high as a RB26.
Please kindly grow up. Thanks.
0 likes
16-12-04, 17:15 GMT+10#15 By changing crank conrods pistons etc ur obviously going to change valve springs bearings other internals etc wich in turn will enable the engine to rev higher than standard.
0 likes
16-12-04, 18:05 GMT+10#16 it all comes down to piston speed and how much your rods can take
0 likes
16-12-04, 18:43 GMT+10#17 Quote:
Originally Posted by duz360
it all comes down to piston speed and how much your rods can take
Yeah that's pretty much it.
Typically engines with a longer stroke than bore don't rev as high as those with a larger bore than stroke.
A really good example is the 2003 model s2000 compared to the 2004 model.
Honda s2000 spec's (2003->2004 model) (http://www.hondanews.com/CatID2069?mid=2003100141254&mime=asc)
0 likes