Hey Guys
Just got the results back from the tester.
I had 3 coolers tested.
COOLER 1
600x300x76 core: 396.8CFM
COOLER 2
600x300x100 core: 448.2CFM
COOLER 3 (for older cars)
400x500x76 core: 464.8CFM
Thanks
T
Please note:
This is information is not to be replicated, published and used for the benefit of others. In doing so, you will be held liable.
wow they can flow a lot of air , but do you know their effiency in cooling the air amongst other critical properties of a cooler.
what is the pitch of the fins? - shape and design plays a big part in how coolers work.
i could make a cooler out of a peice of garden hose , sure its gonna flow remarkable cfm's of air , but its still a pos.
Ogre
liable for what??????????????????????
OVL087, obvioulsy these coolers dont flow aswell as lets say, the ARE coolers, they have their own R&D department, where most of their coolers flow 750+cfm
fin design is critical, very true
this is what allows such high cfm flow from ARE
T
Quote:
Please note:
This is information is not to be replicated, published and used for the benefit of others. In doing so, you will be held liable.
...
At what pressure drop was that flow measured, and how well does each cooler reduce the entering air temperature ?
A straight piece of plastic pipe two feet in diameter, probably flows a million CFM, that does not necessarily make it a good intercooler does it ????
Sorry but you have not really told us anything useful.
you guys dont seem to understand.
the coolers were only bench flowed for cfm rating, they were not tested under presuurised conditions, this is to show the cfm rating of the core.
For true, pressure drop analysis we need to have this running on a car, measuring temps and pressures on each side of the cooler.
We have taken themal image photos of the coolers
these are thermal images of the 450x300x76 cored cooler
liability in terms of publishing and copying this information is not allowed. I have spoken to my lawyer regarding this.
Thanks
T
Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
"liability in terms of publishing and copying this information is not allowed. I have spoken to my lawyer regarding this."
wtf??????????? what do you think people are gonna do with it haha. you post it on a public forum and say no one can copy it? i really dont understand mate
ok man.it just seemed as if you were threatening people with legal action for doing what i didnt know!(quoting it in a post?) now i understand what you are saying.im sure you can understand it came across as a little harsh!
Honestly he has done some good testing and research for you boys which all-in-all is just to shut you up. At the end of the day this is all way too scientific for a road car which is what we all drive and no one will notice the 4 hp difference. So lets just accept the fact that he is selling cheap coolers and they are a good buy. Or am I the only one not driving a Formula 1 car on here??? lol
And if he wants to post legal terms on here - let him. Its not till someone tries to screw you by copying your info that you realise its important.
duz360, i apologise if i came across the wrong way. Its just that you would understand that I am constantly being emailed (abused), that my coolers are **** etc, i'm ripping people off etc etc, it gets to you sometimes.
Thanks for the support guys, much appreciated
the website goes live this week, with all the latest in automotive parts
from NOS, to CO2 injection, along with ARIAS pistons, VENOLIA pistons, turbochargers wastegates etc, you'll love it
T
Ok guys get over it as said before, looks like pro 100 has really had a good crack at testing this cooler, not how many ppl go to this much trouble for your "Truck Cores" 1/2 you guys run?????
Really?