Just want to know, which one is better nolathane or polyurethane. Regards Steve

they are one and the same champ. nolathane is a brand name

yeah, i know nolathane is a brand, but they are both very simular .. i thought nolathane was just that LITTTE! bit better ?

they are just urethane bushes. probably all from the same mould

I have found Super Pro are better than Nolothane from a life expectancy and compliance (hardness) point of view Super Pro also do race spec bushes for Commo's that are harder again.

apart from what hsvsux has just said , u will find that most brands (pedders , nolathane) etc etc and whoever else manufacture their own bush's , they will have basically one generic rating of the firmness of the bush. pedders used to make 3 individual bush's all urethane but having having different hardness , now they just make one. for ur average street car any brand of urethane bush will suffice.

Quote: Originally Posted by HSVSUX I have found Super Pro are better than Nolothane from a life expectancy and compliance (hardness) point of view Super Pro also do race spec bushes for Commo's that are harder again. Super Pro's are what i have put in my whole setup. These seem to be decent and at a reasonable price! Blokes at my local suspension joint said theyve found super pro to be these best so far.

hahha cheers fellas, now im like "hrmmmm ... Whiteline, Nolathane or this Super Pro" ahhah as long as ya stick with all one product im sure it will do the same job as they all do Thanks again fellas steve