Back to shop ↗
THE HOLDEN COMMODORE FORUM

HOLDCOM Community

Built around the cars. Kept alive by the people.

+ Start a discussion
Holden Commodores gathered at Holdcom
Forum Home›VL Commodore
VL Commodore

calaisturbo.com.au - Stock VL N/A Auto 1/4 Time + RWKW

Started by Kylie · 12 Aug 2004 · 12 replies

Preserved from CalaisTurbo. Original authors and dates are shown; archived members are not current Holdcom accounts.

KylieArchived member
Can anybody tell me what they've run down the Quarter or on the Dyno in their Stock (Or close to) VL N/A Autos? I had my car Dynoed and then went to Willowbank Test N Tune last night and I got 83.6 RWKW and ran a 17.3 @ 64MPH, these are the Mods I've done power wise... Mandrel Bent Extractors High Flow Cat 2.5" Exhaust with Sports Muffler K&N Panel Air Filter with Custom Cold Air Induction PowerChip Gold (Tuned for 98 Octane Fuel) Large Transmission Cooler Engine was Rebuilt with a New Head and Reco Injectors about 20000KM Ago Fully Rebuilt Auto, New Torque Converter, Custom Shift Kit, Strengthened - Good for 450HP or so... Am I missing something because I think theres something really wrong with my times, its a Calais but it still shouldn't be that slow. I managed to launch with no wheelspin off the line, there was no way I could possibly make this thing go faster. The only extra weight is a Sub box and 2 Amps, so its not like its majorly weighed down. Can anyone else tell me their experiences with their N/A Auto so I can figure out whats happening? Thanks Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
sr20trxArchived member
17.3 is about what they ran from the factory according to Magazines of the day. But your MPH is abnormally low for even a 17.3! As a guide my old R31 Skyline auto wagon...with 126rwHP ran a 16.223 @ 85mph Some original photos have not been recovered yet.
0 likes
coastvlArchived member
Stock as a rock RB30 stock auto (slipping) No extractors just 2.5 pressbent exhaust, and CAI with K & N filter and I ran a 16.7 @ 84.46 mph. I think you got a problem some where for sure. I've now got extractors and a better auto. Hopefully time will be better but i've spun a bearing so It'll have to wait. ps. I got mine dynoed in that cond and I got 126 rwhp. Thats roughly 92 rwkw.
0 likes
StockyMcStockArchived member
sorry never had mine dynoed but with extractors, 2.5 inch exhaust and cold air intake (no high-flow filter even) i ran a 16.46. the car is an auto and everything else was stock.
0 likes
on19sVLArchived member
Did you manually shift? If so, at what rpm? BTW 64mph, that is really low.
0 likes
KylieArchived member
My launch was perfect, I did 2 runs letting the Auto shift itself which is at 5000RPM, but shifting Manually worked out to be slightly faster, doing that I was changing at 5500RPM, as far as I know thats where Peak Power should be. I was only just shifting into Drive as I went through the traps, so I didn't really even need to get out of 2ND...
0 likes
StockyMcStockArchived member
i manually shifted and was doing 68mph, just changing into drive over the line. that was a 16.4 and my 60 foot time was 2.518
0 likes
kramerArchived member
no one's broken a 16 in a auto na? i reckon mine might be able to :P mates reckon it's pretty quick for an auto one. extractors 2.5 zorst, and a slippy auto. how much faster are the vl 5 speed jobs? n/a.....assuming you can drive of course...?
0 likes
davo_rulzArchived member
Quote: Originally Posted by Kylie My launch was perfect, I did 2 runs letting the Auto shift itself which is at 5000RPM, but shifting Manually worked out to be slightly faster, doing that I was changing at 5500RPM, as far as I know thats where Peak Power should be. I was only just shifting into Drive as I went through the traps, so I didn't really even need to get out of 2ND... Well second gets to 120, and I doubt that you would go much faster than that, but that time seems abnormally low
0 likes
MRV17Archived member
my vn ran a 16.0 with a pod and zaust... i was lovin it and that was 85mph i havent ran my vlt yet i plan to and then sell it
0 likes
John001Archived member
somethin definatley wrong there. in my old 5 speed NA, was stock sept for 2 1/4 inch zorst 15.9 ...
0 likes
JuZiArchived member
john001, i've been told manuals are faster when driven right and they can also get better dyno results when driven right so maybe we shouldnt compare auto to manula, but yeh kylie should be getting into the 16s fairly easily, kylie was the car in overdrive? lol cos that, although being a really stupid mistake, would explain a lot
0 likes
KylieArchived member
No, no Overdrive, also, I was reading the Time Slip wrong, it was actually 82MPH, which makes more sense, but is still damn slow...
0 likes
Sign in or create an account to reply. New members are welcome—no purchase or old CT account needed.

Who’s online

0 members and 0 guests active in the last 15 minutes

No signed-in members active right now. Guests are welcome to browse.

Visitors Today4

33,602 threads, 484,230 posts and 24,058 images saved from CT

98.1% of indexed threads saved