which one would be better to put on my vk 202 motor? (performance wise, and fuel wise)

neither go for a 320 holley , they ave a different star shaped venyuri , which is more suited for the air flow that the old 202 creates. i had one of these on my old vk , also had a 350 holley and it was **** , i did eventually get the jets changed. what other work have u done to it , i had all the exhaust and induction side of it well worked , and for a ****box it went pretty good.

Haven't done hardly anything to it yet. All i've done is put some extractors on it. The reason i choose between those 2 carbys is because i already have both, and woundering which one would be better to do a rebuild on, and put on.

iv got a 350 holly on my EH with the 186 motor in it, it dose pretty well! im not sure you will notice to much difference with what ever one you go for! if you want speed go 350, if you dont want to spend to much on fule go 320. 350 holly sounds better!! Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

yeah, i think i'll go the 350 way. So does the 350 use more fuel then the standard one on the vk 202? I thought it basicly gave better go becasue less enviromental **** on it. Some original photos have not been recovered yet.

i'd go for the 350. but a better option is an injection system out of a VK. but back to the point i would choose the 350

if your in victoria, certain webber systems are illegal.

..get a cam or you'll be doing is increasing your fuel bill. If you use the 350 (read: overkill on a 202) make sure you get it jetted properly - I have heard so many unhappy 202 w/ 350 holley owners coz they are just too big unless they are jetted properly by someone who knows what they are doing.